Register now ! Login
主選單


Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users






問:一般辯論,常常演變成各說各話,有時還要第三者評分,評分者也有各自的主觀色彩,因而辯經豈非意義不大?
#1
版主
版主


See User information
問:一般辯論,常常演變成各說各話,有時還要第三者評分,評分者也有各自的主觀色彩,因而辯經豈非意義不大?

答:
◆先要知道,因明辯經其實相同於下圍棋、象棋,雙方在遊戲規則內公平競爭,分出高下。下完後,雙方都可以一步步逆回,客觀看出何處下差了,輸者馬上學到經驗,提升能力。
◆因明辯經是在規範下,針對一佛法主題,在一問一答中,不斷深入義理,攻方一直立出「因明論式」,守方就其大小前提的正確與否,立即給予回答,因而和下棋一樣,乾淨俐落。所以,因明辯經不同於一般辯論的各說各話。
◆因明辯經也像數學的解題,有時是證明題,有時是測驗題,都要一步步的推導,推導的結果是否正確,都可以接受客觀的檢驗。可參考本網站的辯經實例。

Posted on: 2006/4/10 10:59
Twitter Facebook Google Plus Linkedin Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Mr. Wong Top







You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.
You cannot use topic type.
You cannot use HTML syntax.
You cannot use signature.
You cannot create pdf.
You cannot get print page.

[Advanced Search]