Browsing this Thread:
1 Anonymous Users
得 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
初階會員
 
|
林教授:
<俱舍论>里面关于不相应行的"得"讲得很复杂,有法前得,法后得,法俱得,请问教授,一个法生,住,异,灭不就完了,为什么为安立一个"得"?
Posted on: 2011/7/10 23:13
|
|||
|
||||
Re: 得 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
版主
|
林教授答： （1）例如得和失，在世俗安立上是需要的。 （2）我們對「得」思考下去，有已得、正得（新得）和未得。正得（新得）又可分未得新得與失後新得。如此思考下去。 （3）這些世俗安立，有其方便和需要時就採用。
Posted on: 2011/7/15 10:43
|
|||
|
||||
You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.
You cannot use topic type.
You cannot use HTML syntax.
You cannot use signature.
You cannot create pdf.
You cannot get print page.